DocketNumber: No. FA 93 54413 S
Citation Numbers: 1998 Conn. Super. Ct. 9415
Judges: ZARELLA, J.
Filed Date: 7/27/1998
Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 7/5/2016
On February 24, 1998 the parties agreed that the arrearage due as of February 23, 1998 was $1,766. Transcript, February 24, 1998, p. 3. The issue to which the parties remained in dispute was the time frame in which this amount would be paid. Id., p. 3. The plaintiff-respondent sought an order of payment on the arrearage of $21 per week while the defendant-petitioner sought full payment that day. Id., p. 4. The court after due inquiry into the financial status of the plaintiff respondent ordered that the amount be paid by April 7, 1998. Id., pp. 5-11.
The plaintiff-respondent now seeks to challenge on appeal the arrearage calculation done by the court, in his presence, after having been given the opportunity to comment and after having agreed to the calculated amount. This claim is frivolous. As to the terms of payment of the arrearage the plaintiff-respondent stated in his memorandum that on or before March 31, 1998 he paid the arrearage. Plaintiff-respondent's Memorandum of Law, July 7, 1998, p. 5. This claim therefore is moot.
The court will not address the numerous historical wrongs that the plaintiff-respondent alleges in his memorandum as those issues were not issues before the magistrate and therefore not properly before this court on appeal.
The court finds no error.
Zarella, J.