DocketNumber: No. CV94 0141129 S
Citation Numbers: 1995 Conn. Super. Ct. 7084
Judges: D'ANDREA, J. CT Page 7085
Filed Date: 6/15/1995
Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 4/18/2021
The plaintiff has filed a motion for summary judgment, to which the defendant objected on the ground that the pleadings are not closed.
The plaintiff has presented evidence establishing that there is no genuine issue of material fact. The defendant's objection to the motion for summary judgment is not well taken in that Practice Book § 379 provides that a "party may move for a summary judgment at anytime." Furthermore, the special defense asserted by the defendant does not attack the making, enforcement or validity of the note at issue in this action, and therefore, the defendant has failed to assert a valid special defense. Accordingly, summary judgment is granted because the defendant has failed to demonstrate the existence of a disputed factual issue. See Burns v. Hartford Hospital,
D'ANDREA, J.