DocketNumber: No. CV 98-0579333
Citation Numbers: 1998 Conn. Super. Ct. 12872
Judges: FREED, J.
Filed Date: 11/2/1998
Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 4/18/2021
On October 8, 1998. the plaintiff filed a motion to open the judgment. The plaintiff alleged that its motion should be granted on the grounds that the Veterans Administration guaranteed its mortgage and will now not be able to guaranty it because "it was not able to provide bidding instructions in a timely fashion."
As authority for this court's power to grant this motion despite the provisions of General Statutes §
In New Milford Savings Bank the Supreme Court held that the trial court had the authority to reopen a judgment after title had vested on equitable grounds where the judgment contained a scrivener's error, to correct an inadvertent omission in a foreclosure complaint.
In PNC Mortgage Corp v. Mateus, supra, the court based its granting of the motion to reopen on the fact that "all parties agree to the granting of the motion". This, of course, has always been the law of this state, i.e. §
The allegations of fact in this case contain none of the exceptions recognized by our courts to permit a reopening in this case.
The motion to reopen is denied.
Freed, J. CT Page 12874