DocketNumber: No. CV 90 0270620
Judges: LEWIS, JUDGE.
Filed Date: 1/17/1992
Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 4/18/2021
There is a split of authority in the Superior Court, with most of the judges agreeing to strike this type of claim. There has not been a definitive ruling by our appellate courts. I have not stricken claims for double/treble damages in the past on the theory that the issue should await resolution by an appellate tribunal, and that in the meantime the decision should be made by the trial judge.
However, in this particular case the motion to strike is granted for failure to comply with the wording of General Statutes
In paragraph 4 of the first count of her complaint, the plaintiff, Maureen E. Driscoll, does refer to "recklessness," and in paragraph 6 that as a result of such recklessness, she sustained personal injuries, but she does not in my opinion plead General Statutes
Hence the motion to strike is denied on the retroactivity issue, but is granted on the ground that the statute was not adequately invoked.
So Ordered.
Dated at Bridgeport, Connecticut, this 17th day of January, 1992.
WILLIAM B. LEWIS, JUDGE