DocketNumber: No. 70414
Citation Numbers: 1995 Conn. Super. Ct. 12400
Judges: SPALLONE, STATE TRIAL REFEREE.
Filed Date: 10/30/1995
Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 7/5/2016
After hearing duly held, the parties represented by counsel, the court, by preponderance of the credible, relevant and legally admissible evidence finds, concludes and rules as follows:
The plaintiff, Sun Co., Inc., is the owner of the property subject to the condemnation proceedings and is an aggrieved party and has standing to pursue these proceedings.
The plaintiff is applying for a review of the statement of compensation in the amount of $47,700.00 filed by the Commissioner on April 20, 1993, in regard to a taking of the premises as is more fully described in the appeal and application for review. Said premises are located in the city of Middletown.
The highest and best use of the premises is the existing present use as a gasoline station and convenience store. Further, as this was a partial take; the plaintiff is seeking damages reflecting a loss after the take, which is the difference between the value of land before the take and the value of the land after the take.
The plaintiff's expert, J. Brian Bergen, testified that, in his opinion, as of April 20, 1993, the value of the land before the take was $564,000.00 and the value of the land after the take was $393,580.00, indicating damages in the amount of $170,420.00.
The defendant's expert, John B. Flint, testified that in his opinion, the subject property before the take was valued at $535,900.00 and after the take he valued the property at $490,300.00, added $7,100.00 in easement charges, for a total of CT Page 12401 $46,700.00 in damages.
In valuating property, the trial court is charged with the duty of making an independent valuation of the property involved.E F Realty Co. v. Commissioner of Transportation,
Guided by the aforesaid applicable law, the court finds the value of the premises, subject to the condemnation and before the taking to be $535,900.00, said premises after the take to be $488,200.00, plus $1,100.00 in easement charges, resulting in damage of $47,700.00. The defendant has paid into court the sum of $47,700.00.
The plaintiff has been justly compensated and accordingly the appeal is dismissed and judgment may enter for the defendant, plus costs.
SPALLONE STATE TRIAL REFEREE
Judgment entered in accordance with Foregoing Memorandum of Decision. CT Page 12402
Jonathan W. Field Deputy Chief Clerk
Colaluca v. Ives , 150 Conn. 521 ( 1963 )
D'ADDARIO v. Commissioner of Transportation , 180 Conn. 355 ( 1980 )
E & F REALTY CO. v. Commissioner of Transportation , 173 Conn. 247 ( 1977 )
Moss v. New Haven Redevelopment Agency , 146 Conn. 421 ( 1959 )
Richard v. A. Waldman & Sons, Inc. , 155 Conn. 343 ( 1967 )
Schnier v. Commissioner of Transportation , 172 Conn. 427 ( 1977 )
Tandet v. Urban Redevelopment Commission , 179 Conn. 293 ( 1979 )
Pandolphe's Auto Parts, Inc. v. Town of Manchester , 181 Conn. 217 ( 1980 )