DocketNumber: No. CV96 0150626 S CT Page 3645
Citation Numbers: 1998 Conn. Super. Ct. 3644
Judges: D'ANDREA, JUDGE.
Filed Date: 3/25/1998
Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 7/5/2016
If the plaintiff claims that the defendants' objections to interrogatories and production requests should be heard, or that there are "non-objected to" items still not complied with, an appropriate motion on the short calendar would be entertained provided the provisions of P.B. §§
Plaintiff's "motion to restore to the docket" dated March 10, 1998 (#181) is denied. A "nunc pro tunc" motion is an improper one, and further, the court's ruling on motion #179 and the objection thereto (#180) gives the plaintiff all the relief to which she is entitled at this time.
So Ordered.
D'ANDREA, J.