DocketNumber: No. CV 95 070 58 44
Citation Numbers: 1995 Conn. Super. Ct. 14155
Judges: MALONEY, J.
Filed Date: 12/19/1995
Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 7/5/2016
At the request of plaintiff's counsel, the court excused the plaintiff from being present at oral argument on this appeal.
In his brief, the plaintiff advances four arguments in support of his appeal: (1) that there was insufficient proof of the time when he was operating his vehicle; (2) that the hearing officer wrongfully admitted in evidence the police officer's narrative report as a supplement to the A-44 form; (3) that the police officer lacked authority to arrest the plaintiff on an interstate highway; and (4) that the hearing officer failed to consider the plaintiff's evidence. CT Page 14156
Time of Operation
The police officer's report states that he found the plaintiff alone in his vehicle with the engine running at 9:32 PM on March 10, 1995. That is sufficient evidence that the plaintiff was operating the vehicle at that time. State v. Swift,
Narrative Report
This court has repeatedly held that a police officer's narrative report may be admissible as a supplement to the A-44 report form. See, e.g., Feld v. Commissioner, Superior Court. judicial district of Hartford/New Britain at Hartford, Docket No. CV94 070 51 72 (April 12, 1995, Maloney, J.). The reasoning of that case is fully applicable here.
Authority of Arresting Officer
The arresting officer is a member of the Manchester Police Department. He arrested the plaintiff on Interstate Highway 384 where it passes through Manchester. The plaintiff contends that the state police have exclusive jurisdiction over interstate highways. He offers no statutory or other authority in support of this theory. It may not be sustained.
Plaintiff's Expert Evidence
The report of the plaintiff's expert was introduced in evidence at the administrative hearing. If believed, it would tend to prove that the results of the breath tests were not reliable evidence of the alcohol content of the plaintiff's blood at the time he was operating the vehicle.
A basic principle of administrative law is that the scope of the court's review of an agency's decision is very limited. General Statutes §
Under the circumstances of the present case, General Statutes §
For all of the reasons set forth above, the appeal is dismissed.
MALONEY, J.