DocketNumber: No. CV89 0260235 S
Citation Numbers: 1992 Conn. Super. Ct. 7240
Judges: DRISCOLL, STATE TRIAL REFEREE.
Filed Date: 7/30/1992
Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 4/18/2021
The City, on the other had, did offer evidence of the income received from the property by the plaintiff but made no attempt to inform the court of what the capitalization rate would be for that income.
Nevertheless, the court finds that the plaintiff has failed to sustain its burden of proof that the valuation was excessive since the transaction offered to establish that value was between relatives, and no other evidence was produced. See Gorin's, Inc. v. Board of Tax Review,
The appeal is, therefore, dismissed.
MARGARET C. DRISCOLL STATE TRIAL REFEREE