DocketNumber: No. CV97 33 98 79 S
Citation Numbers: 1998 Conn. Super. Ct. 9048, 22 Conn. L. Rptr. 520
Judges: THIM, J.
Filed Date: 8/14/1998
Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 7/5/2016
For the purpose of adjudicating the motion to dismiss, the parties agree that the facts are as alleged by the plaintiff in her complaint. She alleges the following: The plaintiff was hired as a teacher in 1963 by the Board of Education of the City of Bridgeport and served in that capacity for twenty-four years. In January of 1993, she commenced treatment with a licensed CT Page 9049 psychologist. She has a "past history of mental disorder, post traumatic stress disorder and reactive depression and anxiety." In August of 1994, the defendant terminated the plaintiff's employment "allegedly based on the Plaintiff's in efficiency or incompetence and inability to perform the duties and responsibilities of her teaching position. "The plaintiff further alleges that the defendant acted in violation of §
Section
The defendant argues that the plaintiff's exclusive right to challenge the termination of her employment as a tenured teacher lies under General Statutes §
The plaintiff, on the other hand, contends that §
The plaintiff was a tenured teacher.1 "A tenure teacher's challenge of an allegedly wrongful discharge is governed by and limited to the statutory appeal process provided by §
There are exceptions to the rule of exhaustion of administrative remedies. The plaintiff, however, has not alleged CT Page 9050 an exception. See LaCroix v. Board of Education, supra at 79.
THIM, JUDGE.