DocketNumber: No. CV96-78291
Citation Numbers: 1998 Conn. Super. Ct. 9733
Judges: <footnote_body>[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]</footnote_body> ARENA, J.
Filed Date: 4/13/1998
Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 4/18/2021
The plaintiff, Town of Cromwell, instituted this tax lien foreclosure action against the defendants, Arthur Alden and Joseph Perotti. The defendants filed an answer and three special defenses. By motion dated December 24, 1997, the plaintiff moved to strike the special defenses.
"Whenever any party wishes to contest the . . . legal sufficiency of any answer to any complaint, . . . including any special defense contained therein, that party may do so by filing a motion to strike the contested pleading or part thereof." Practice Book § 152(5). "[A] plaintiff can [move to strike] a special defense." Nowak v. Nowak,
The first special defense alleged by the defendant Arthur Alden claims that the plaintiff's action is barred by lack of jurisdiction over the person, insufficiency of process and insufficiency of service of process in that the publication did not state the nature of the action to be foreclosure of a tax lien as required by Connecticut Practice Book Section 201. The defendant previously asserted this claim in a motion to dismiss which was denied by the court, Stanley, J., on November 4, 1996. CT Page 9734
"Parties cannot be permitted to waste the time of courts by the repetition in new pleadings of claims which have been set up on the record and overruled at an earlier stage of the proceedings." Sheff v. O'Neil,
The second special defense asserted by Arthur Alden and Joseph Perotti alleges that the action is "invalid on the basis that it constitutes an improper de facto condemnation of the defendant's property without compensation in violation of the Connecticut and United States Constitution."
"Where the General Assembly has established complete, adequate and speedy statutory remedies for alleged tax irregularities, a taxpayer must exhaust them." Norwich Departmentof Public Utilities v. Lebanon,
The third joint special defense asserted by defendants Alden and Perotti alleges that the Town of Cromwell improperly began assessing the taxes after negotiations between the parties failed. Again, "a claim of unlawful assessment of taxes cannot properly be raised in an action to collect those taxes."Voluntown v. Rytman,
For the foregoing reasons, the plaintiff's motion to strike all three special defenses is hereby ordered granted.
ARENA, J.