DocketNumber: File No. 281950
Citation Numbers: 486 A.2d 666, 40 Conn. Super. Ct. 214, 40 Conn. Supp. 214
Judges: CORRIGAN, J.
Filed Date: 12/12/1984
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 1/12/2023
The plaintiff brings this action for injuries sustained when a rope, which was to maintain the branch of the tree he was cutting, broke and the resulting vibration hurled him to the ground from the tree. He has sued the owner of the premises who provided the rope and the manufacturer and the retailer of the rope. The counts against the manufacturer and the retailer are brought in products liability and the count against the owner in negligence. The allegations of negligence specified against the owner are that he knew or in the exercise of reasonable care and inspection should have known that (1) the rope was unsafe, improper and insufficient for the use and purposes intended, and (2) use of the rope subjected the plaintiff to an unreasonable and foreseeable risk of bodily injury; and that the defendant failed to warn the plaintiff of the foreseeable risk of bodily injury in utilizing the rope for a purpose and use for which it was not intended. The owner has cross complained in indemnity against the other two defendants and the defendant Wellington Leisure Products, Inc., moves to strike that complaint on the ground that it fails to state a recognizable cause of action in that it seeks contribution from an alleged joint tortfeasor.
It is not permitted to seek contribution from a joint tortfeasor. Fox v. Fox,
The motion to strike is therefore denied.