DocketNumber: No. FA 93-0345003S
Citation Numbers: 2001 Conn. Super. Ct. 6090
Judges: DOMNARSKI, JUDGE.
Filed Date: 5/18/2001
Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 7/5/2016
The court understood that the plaintiff sought a modification of the order pertaining to custody of the minor children. The pleading filed by the plaintiff should have complied with Practice Book §
At the hearing the court considered the evidence and concluded that the plaintiff had not shown by a preponderance of the evidence that it would be in the best interest of the children, at that time, to modify the order of custody. The court also expressed a desire to hear from the court appointed guardian for the minor children before taking further action on the request.
The plaintiffs motion to reargue is denied.
Domnarski, J