DocketNumber: No. CV 02-0815500S
Citation Numbers: 2002 Conn. Super. Ct. 14844, 33 Conn. L. Rptr. 397
Judges: STENGEL, JUDGE.
Filed Date: 11/15/2002
Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 7/5/2016
The defendant/apportionment plaintiff, Walter S. Gurski argues in his Memorandum in Opposition to the Motions to Strike, that §
This court concludes that the cases referenced as to the issue in question are persuasive and that their holdings should be followed.
It is perhaps accurate, when in Audie v. Hospital of St. Raphael's, etal., No. CV 95-00522325, Corradino, J. said, "This may be a situation where legislative action not judicial creativity is appropriate."
The Motions to Strike are denied.
___________________ Stengel, J. CT Page 14845