DocketNumber: No. CV01-0447904
Citation Numbers: 2002 Conn. Super. Ct. 1269
Judges: ARNOLD, JUDGE.
Filed Date: 1/29/2002
Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 7/5/2016
On December 8, 1997, the plaintiff, New Haven entered into a loan and security agreement with defendant Absolute. By promissory note dated December 8, 1997, Absolute promised to pay New Haven the principal sum of $25,000. The defendant Absolute thereafter failed to make the monthly payments under the note. By Guaranty, also dated December 8, 1997, defendant Nacca unconditionally guaranteed the payment of performance from or by the borrower, Absolute, of any and all obligations of the borrower to the lender, New Haven. On May 15, 2001, the plaintiff obtained a judgment against defendants Absolute and DeMatteo in the amount of $21,772.47 plus costs. No part of the judgment has been paid by the defendants, and defendant Nacca has failed to make payment in full to the plaintiff in accordance with the terms of the Guaranty, signed by Nacca.
"A Motion for Summary Judgment is designed to eliminate the delay and expense of litigating an issue where there is no real issue to be tried."Wilson v. New Haven,
In the present action the defendant Nacca has admitted as true all of the relevant allegations of the plaintiff's complaint. Nacca admits that Absolute defaulted on the Note. Nacca admits also that he executed a written guaranty, unconditionally guaranteeing the payment from or by Absolute of any and all obligations of the borrower to the lender. There is no dispute that the court has entered a judgment against Absolute, on the note, and as against DeMatteo, on his Guaranty. There is no dispute as to liability under the Note or Guaranty.
The defendant has filed a special defense regarding offers of partial payment. This defense is without merit. The Note signed by Absolute provides that if Absolute failed to make any of its payments required under the Note, then the plaintiff, as Holder, may accelerate the Note making it due and payable immediately. "If the debtor does not tender payment in full, the holder retains the right to reject any partial payment. . . . Christensen v. Cutaia,
Accordingly, the motion for summary judgment is hereby granted.
The Court
by Arnold, J.