DocketNumber: No. CV 00 0439182
Citation Numbers: 2001 Conn. Super. Ct. 12254
Judges: PITTMAN, JUDGE.
Filed Date: 8/17/2001
Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 7/5/2016
The defendant has filed a Motion to Compel Arbitration. The plaintiff objects because it asserts that the value of its claim against the defendant is vastly in excess of any coverage afforded by the Liberty Mutual policy.
The defendant is putting the cart before the horse. There is no coverage issue yet, because there has been no determination that the defendant is liable to the plaintiff. Even if that turns out to be the case, there is no competent evidence that such a judgment would be substantially covered by the Liberty Mutual policy such that a coverage controversy exists. But most important regarding the Motion to Compel, there is no evidence that the defendant is herself a signatory of the arbitration agreement. The court cannot read the terms of the intercompany agreement as obligating the plaintiff to arbitrate with one who is not a signatory to it.
The plaintiff is not obligated under its arbitration agreement with Liberty Mutual to arbitrate with Irene Rogers, at least not until the litigation against this defendant terminates in a determination or concession that this defendant is liable to the plaintiff. CT Page 12255
The Motion to Compel Arbitration is denied.
Patty Jenkins Pittman, J.