DocketNumber: No. 099205
Citation Numbers: 1992 Conn. Super. Ct. 4318
Judges: GAFFNEY, J. CT Page 4319
Filed Date: 5/13/1992
Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 7/5/2016
Whether, as the defendant-Piersall asserts, he was an independent contractor who was engaged in providing a service, raises issues of fact; F.A.S. International, Inc. v. Reilly,
By the same token, whether, as the plaintiffs claim, the defendant in the performance of his work, or portions of it, falls within the definition of a product seller;
Summary relief is inappropriate unless . . . "there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and . . . the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law" Connecticut Bank Trust Co. v. Carriage Lane Associates,
In its application of the above standard, the court is unable to conclude that there is an absence of a genuine issue of material fact. Accordingly, the motion for summary judgment is denied.
GAFFNEY, J. CT Page 4320
Spring v. Constantino , 168 Conn. 563 ( 1975 )
D.H.R. Construction Co. v. Donnelly , 180 Conn. 430 ( 1980 )
United Oil Co. v. Urban Redevelopment Commission , 158 Conn. 364 ( 1969 )
Coburn v. Lenox Homes, Inc. , 173 Conn. 567 ( 1977 )
Electrolux Corporation v. Danaher , 128 Conn. 342 ( 1941 )
F.A.S. International, Inc. v. Reilly , 179 Conn. 507 ( 1980 )
Carbone v. Connecticut Light Power Co. , 40 Conn. Super. Ct. 120 ( 1984 )