DocketNumber: No. X04-CV-95-0115305S
Citation Numbers: 1999 Conn. Super. Ct. 13924
Judges: KOLETSKY, JUDGE.
Filed Date: 10/21/1999
Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 7/5/2016
The Court has a reasonably clear recollection, after reviewing the transcript and the reporter's notes, that that is what was actually said. The Court is issuing this in the nature of a Memorandum of Decision, but is expressly inviting counsel to request a hearing and/or oral argument, by filing a Motion to Reargue this decision. It is the Court's belief that this result is not controversial, but in this particular case the Court has learned not to make that assumption. Therefore, the Court will grant any parties' Motion to Reargue this decision.
Although a notice has gone out that the agreed motion to rectify the transcript has been granted, counsel should be aware that there are numerous additional changes (again, none controversial, one hopes), made in the course of the review of the transcript. The Court will be happy to entertain any motions if any differences between the overnight transcript on which the CT Page 13925 rectification motions were based and the transcript which will be filed with the Supreme Court, cause any party the slightest bit of concern.
Koletsky, J.