DocketNumber: No. CV 97 0156360
Citation Numbers: 1998 Conn. Super. Ct. 5699
Judges: LEWIS, JUDGE.
Filed Date: 5/1/1998
Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 7/5/2016
The present case is an action to collect a debt. The plaintiff alleges that it provided medical services consisting of detoxification treatment to four indigent Stamford residents, and that the defendant city authorized, and is required to pay, for these services
The plaintiff filed a motion for summary judgment (#121). The defendant opposed the motion and submitted evidence including affidavits, and copies of the alleged authorization.
The affidavit of Mr. Bonaparte, a former welfare worker for Stamford, who allegedly gave two of the authorizations, shows that there are disputed facts regarding the validity and/or scope of the defendant's authorizations for the services rendered by the plaintiff. Specifically, there are genuine issues regarding the meaning of "authoriz[ation] . . . at the state rate set by Hartford" and "authoriz[ation] . . . at the current state rates." The defendant also has demonstrated there are issues regarding the validity and/or scope of the other two authorizations.
The plaintiff's motion for summary judgment is denied.
So Ordered.
Dated at Stamford, Connecticut, this 1st day of May, 1998.
WILLIAM BURKE LEWIS, JUDGE