DocketNumber: No. 0105487
Citation Numbers: 1992 Conn. Super. Ct. 1837
Judges: FRANK S. MEADOW, J.
Filed Date: 2/7/1992
Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 7/5/2016
A review of the files finds that there was a written contract between Stack and Petco (attached as Exhibit C to Motion #134). No copy of a contract exists in the file D N v. Stack, and Stack claims no written contract exists between them. Further, the only thing these cases have in common is that the defendant is the same and so is the plaintiffs' lawyer. The plaintiffs performed substantially different work for Stack. Because of these differences and the apparent lack of a written contract in D N, the two cases are not similar enough to warrant consolidation.
FRANK S. MEADOW, J.