DocketNumber: No. CR99-148911
Citation Numbers: 2003 Conn. Super. Ct. 2864
Judges: MIANO, JUDGE. HOLDEN, JUDGE. IANOTTI, JUDGE.
Filed Date: 2/25/2003
Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 4/17/2021
At the hearing before the Division counsel for the petitioner opined that the prior consecutive sentences for a violation of probation and possession of narcotics, a total of 10 years to serve, wherein the petitioner received close to the maximum sentence on each was excessive. Counsel opined that in the event the defendant had been convicted in the first trial1 the sentencing court would not have been likely to "stack sentences." Counsel represented that in the instant matter there was no evidence that the petitioner fired a gun, and the situation was no more than a struggle over a gun in which no one was injured. Counsel claimed the 15-year consecutive sentence is excessive.
The counsel for the State countered that the petitioner's conduct at the time in question was "unusual" and that there was "significant drama CT Page 2865 attached" wherein the petitioner entered a home looking for its occupants and shots were fired — 5 children were in the residence along with two adults.
Pursuant to Connecticut Practice Book §
The Division is without authority to modify a sentence except in accordance with the provisions of Connecticut Practice Book §
Taking into consideration that the petitioner had prior revocations of probation combined with the extremely violent nature of the instant offense, with a firearm, the sentence imposed is neither inappropriate nor disproportionate.
In reviewing the records as a whole, the Division finds that the sentencing court's actions were in accordance with the parameters of Connecticut Practice Book §
The sentence is AFFIRMED.
Miano, J. Holden, J. Ianotti, J.
Miano, J., Holden, J., and Ianotti, J. participated in this decision.