Citation Numbers: 231 A.2d 86, 27 Conn. Super. Ct. 108, 27 Conn. Supp. 108, 1967 Conn. Super. LEXIS 202
Judges: BY THE DIVISION.
Filed Date: 4/3/1967
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/3/2024
The defendant pleaded guilty to one count charging violation of the Uniform State Narcotic Drug Act (General Statutes §§ 19-246, 19-265a), and to one count charging theft of a motor vehicle (§ 53-57). On September 24, 1965, he was committed to the Connecticut reformatory for a term of five years and a day on each count, to be served concurrently. The court suspended execution of the sentence and ordered the defendant committed to the custody of the probation officer for a period of two years. The record establishes that he was given notice of his right to request a review of his sentence on the day that sentence was imposed.
On April 20, 1966, the court revoked the defendant's probation and ordered him to serve the sentence of five years and a day imposed on September 24, 1965. On May 16, 1966, the defendant filed an application for review of his sentence. This application was not filed within thirty days after the original imposition of sentence on September 24, 1965, but was filed within thirty days after the revocation *Page 109 of probation and the order to serve the term originally imposed and suspended.
General Statutes §
Because this application for review was not filed within thirty days from the date commitment was imposed, the Review Division has no statutory authority to consider or make any decision in regard to it. State v. Webb, supra, 12.
Accordingly, the application for review must be dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
PALMER, HEALEY and BARBER, JS., participated in this decision.