DocketNumber: No. FA91 0115017 S
Citation Numbers: 1995 Conn. Super. Ct. 683
Judges: HARRIGAN, J.
Filed Date: 1/31/1995
Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 7/5/2016
The plaintiff received a severance package upon his subsequent separation from IBM, an event beyond his control. Since then he has attempted to distribute a newsletter, an activity similar to his duties at his erstwhile employer. This activity generated minimal income.
On October 17, 1994, the hearing on these motions was recessed at which time the court, finding that the plaintiff's newsletter would not generate a living wage, instructed the plaintiff that he had to intensify his search for new employment.
The hearing resumed on January 23, 1995. The plaintiff presented evidence that he had made extensive efforts to find employment without success. The court now finds that these efforts demonstrate that he has been unable to find employment that would utilize his skills, training and experience.
The plaintiff has clearly established a substantial change of his circumstances since the original alimony order was entered. He is entitled to a modification. The periodic alimony order is reduced to $1.00 per year.
The plaintiff also seeks to terminate a QDRO designed to collect the alimony. This request is denied.
The plaintiff also seeks to terminate life insurance. Article VI of the Separation Agreement provides for various contingencies that were not addressed in this hearing. The court declines to address the insurance issue.
The modification is entered. No retroactivity is ordered, §
No contempt is found and the defendant's motion is denied.
HARRIGAN, J.