DocketNumber: No. CV 960562793
Citation Numbers: 1996 Conn. Super. Ct. 9217
Judges: SULLIVAN, J.
Filed Date: 11/7/1996
Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 7/5/2016
The Appeals Referee determined that the decision of the Administrator was issued on September 28, 1995. That General Statute
The Appeals Referee further found that "the claimant did not file a timely appeal because, at the time, the claimant was involved in an arbitration procedure with his former employer and he was distracted with this process and failed to give the unemployment matter his full attention."
The regulation of the Administrator, promulgated under General Statutes
The Appeals Referee affirmed the decision of the Administrator and dismissed the Appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
The Employment Security Appeals Division Board of Review affirmed the decision of the Appeals Referee. "The decision of the Referee is affirmed and the appeal isdismissed. (Emphasis in the original).
The court has reviewed the record and determines that the decision of the Appeals Referee and the Employment Security Appeals Division Board of Review is fully supported by the record and is not arbitrary, unreasonable or in abuse of discretion.
Gumbs v. Administrator,"it is also true that appeals within the unemployment compensation system must be taken on a timely fashion and, if they are not, they come `too late for review'. Id. The plaintiff's petition for review shall be dismissed by the trial court as untimely".
Consequently the motion to Dismiss of the Administrator, Unemployment Compensation Act, is granted. CT Page 9219
L. Paul Sullivan, J.