DocketNumber: No. CV 94-0460091S
Citation Numbers: 1995 Conn. Super. Ct. 4735
Judges: KREMSKI, STATE TRIAL REFEREE.
Filed Date: 5/5/1995
Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 7/5/2016
Indeed, it seems that the plaintiff agrees that the issue has already been decided, because her revised complaint dated and filed March 14, 1995, abandons her previous use of "wrongful conduct" and uses the phrase "negligence and carelessness." The plaintiff cannot undo this previous ruling by requesting an amendment which would resurrect the very language that had been ordered removed by the court. The same argument applies to any other instances of the insertion of language previously ordered removed or revised. Because this very dispute has already been the subject of a request to revise between the parties; see Defendant's Request to Revise, filed on March 28, 1994; and because the parties apparently agree that this issue has been previously ruled upon by the court, the plaintiff's request to amend her complaint is denied.
JULIUS J. KREMSKI STATE TRIAL REFEREE