DocketNumber: No. CV91 283623S
Citation Numbers: 1995 Conn. Super. Ct. 13548
Judges: BELINKIE, JUDGE REFEREE.
Filed Date: 12/5/1995
Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 7/5/2016
The jury award consisted of an amount $5,379.53 economic damages and $5,000. non-economic damages. CT Page 13549
It is generally a fruitless endeavor to attempt to analyze factors that might be involved in a jury award of damages, or, conjecture as to how or why a jury arrived at its determination of damages. While the award for non-economic damages might not be considered overly generous, "The matter of damages is peculiarly one for determination in the trial court and the decision can be disturbed only from considerations of the most persuasive character . . . something more than a doubt of its inadequacy must exist." Hauk v. Zimmerman,
There is nothing in this case that so indicates. "A conclusion that the jury exercised merely poor judgment is likewise insufficient." Birgel v. Heintz,
The motion is denied.
BELINKIE, JUDGE REFEREE