DocketNumber: No. CV95-0374277S
Citation Numbers: 1998 Conn. Super. Ct. 4497, 21 Conn. L. Rptr. 681
Judges: PITTMAN, J.
Filed Date: 4/15/1998
Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 7/5/2016
The matter was referred to an attorney factfinder, pursuant to Connecticut General Statutes §
The factfinder issued the Finding of Fact on February 19, 1998, and it was filed with this court on February 20, 1998, the one hundred twenty-first day after the evidence concluded.
The factfinder recommended judgment for the plaintiff in the amount of $7,867.37 The defendant has filed an Objection to Finding of Fact, claiming the factfinder's report was untimely filed and that it did not properly consider the evidence.
The allowance by the factfinder of the filing of post-trial briefs extended the completion date of the factfinding process. See Frank v. Streeter,
The other claim of the defendant, that the attorney factfinder railed to find facts related to the defendant's special defense, is without merit. The defendant claims that the plaintiff was obligated to provide certain insurance on the equipment to protect the defendant from any claim of damage. The factfinder addressed and rejected this special defense in paragraphs
The defendant's Objection to Findings of Fact is overruled.
Judgment shall enter in accordance with the report. CT Page 4499
PITTMAN, J.