DocketNumber: No. CV99 0066491S
Citation Numbers: 1999 Conn. Super. Ct. 9372
Judges: ARNOLD, JUDGE. CT Page 9373
Filed Date: 7/20/1999
Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 4/17/2021
Connecticut Practice Book, Section
"(a) Whenever any parties wishes to contest (1) the legal sufficiency of any complaint, counterclaim or cross claim, or of any one or more counts thereof, to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, or (2) the legal sufficiency of any prayer for relief in any such complaint, counterclaim or cross complaint, or (3) the legal sufficiency of any such complaint, counterclaim, cross complaint, or any count thereof because of the absence of any necessary party, or (4) the joining of two or more causes of action which cannot be properly united in one complaint, whether the same be stated in one or more counts, or (5) the legal sufficiency of any answer to any complaint, counterclaim or cross complaint, or any part of that answer including any special defense contained therein, the party may do so by filing a motion to strike the contested pleading or part thereof."
The plaintiff's Motion to Strike does not fall withinConnecticut Practice Book Sections (a)(1)(2)(3)(4) or (5) and therefore is denied.
Connecticut General Statutes §
While the appearance filed by the defendant does not indicate that the appearing pro se defendant is an officer of the 3 Brothers Sport Shop, the plaintiff has conceded this point in its Motion to Strike. CT Page 9374
The Court hereby rules that a Motion to Strike does not apply in this matter, and that the defendant corporation is not barred from appearing pro se through one of its officers.
Accordingly, the Motion to Strike is denied.
THE COURT
by ARNOLD, J.