DocketNumber: No. CV 95-0326327 S
Citation Numbers: 1998 Conn. Super. Ct. 9871
Filed Date: 7/2/1998
Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 7/5/2016
FIRST REQUESTED REVISION
Delete "agent."
REASON
This language constitutes an improper pleading of a legal conclusion.
OBJECTION — Defendant Mark Fuller's actions toward Plaintiff as set forth in the Third Party Complaint were carried out by Defendant Fuller in his capacity as General Manager of Defendant Golf Club, acting on behalf of Defendant Golf Club, and therefore Defendant Fuller is properly described as an agent of Defendant Golf Club.
FIRST REQUESTED REVISION
Specify what facts establish that Plaintiff was "unfairly" blamed, and by whom.
REASON
This paragraph is unduly vague. See P.B. Sec.
OBJECTION
FIRST REQUESTED REVISION
Specify what facts establish that the hydraulic lines were "intentionally" inverted and severed.
REASON
This paragraph is unduly vague. It fails to set out the facts that establish "intentional" inversion and severance, without which Defendants cannot plead to this allegation.
OBJECTION Intentional actions against Plaintiff are evidentiary in nature and are the proper subject of Defendants' discovery.
FIRST REQUESTED REVISION
Specify what is meant by a "secure and stable working environment" and set forth facts establishing how Defendant Fuller "undermined" Plaintiff's efforts.
REASON
This paragraph is unduly vague. Plaintiff fails to specify what is meant by a "secure and stable working environment" or set forth facts establishing how Fuller "undermined" it without which Defendants cannot plead to this allegation.
OBJECTION
FIRST REQUESTED REVISION
Deleting this paragraph.
REASON
This paragraph constitutes an improper pleading of a legal conclusion.
OBJECTION On December 4, 1995, the Court sustained Plaintiff's objection to Defendant, Connecticut Golf Club's Request to Revise the same allegation as is set forth in this paragraph against Defendant Mark Fuller. The Court's ruling sustaining Plaintiff's objection should properly apply to Defendant Mark Fuller.
FIRST REQUESTED REVISION
That the Plaintiff specify his alleged inability to find employment in his field by the words, actions and deeds which demonstrate this alleged inability, specify with more particularity "suitable employment", and specify the facts which demonstrate his alleged "substantial economic loss."
REASON
The instant allegation is unduly vague. See Conn. P.B. Sec.
OBJECTION On December 4, 1995, the Court sustained Plaintiff's objection to Defendant Connecticut Golf Club's Request to Revise the same allegation as is set forth in this paragraph against Defendant, Mark Fuller. The Court's ruling sustaining Plaintiff's objection should properly apply to Defendant Mark Fuller.
FIRST REQUESTED REVISION
That Plaintiff specify who among Defendant's agents, servants and/or employees allegedly intentionally interfered with Plaintiff in the performance of his duties.
REASON
The instant allegation is unduly vague. See P.B. Sec.
OBJECTION
Allegations of Defendant Golf Club's agents, servants and/or employees' intentional interference are set forth throughout Plaintiff's Third Party Complaint and to repeat them would be redundant. Intentional interferences against Plaintiff are evidentiary in nature and are the proper subject of Defendants' discovery.
FIRST REQUESTED REVISION
That Plaintiff specify the facts which establish that Fuller allegedly avoided any attempt to find solutions to the problem, and specify the words, actions and conduct which was used.
REASON
The instant allegation is unduly vague. See P.B. Sec.
OBJECTION
FIRST REQUESTED REVISION
Deleting this paragraph.
REASON
This paragraph constitutes an improper pleading of a legal conclusion.
OBJECTION
Plaintiff's allegations of Defendant Mark Fuller's inducements and fraudulent intentions are evidentiary in nature and are the proper subject for Defendants' discovery.
FIRST REQUESTED REVISION
Delete this paragraph.
REASON
This paragraph constitutes an improper pleading of a legal conclusion.
OBJECTION On December 4, 1995, the Court sustained Plaintiff's objection to Defendant Connecticut Golf Club's Request to Revise the same allegation as is set forth in this paragraph against Defendant, Mark Fuller. The Court's ruling sustaining Plaintiff's objection should properly apply to Defendant Mark Fuller.
FIRST REQUESTED REVISION
Delete this paragraph.
REASON
This paragraph constitutes an improper pleading of a legal conclusion.
OBJECTION
On December 4, 1995, the Court sustained Plaintiff's objection to Defendant Connecticut Golf Club's Request to Revise the same allegation as is set forth in this paragraph against Defendant, Mark Fuller. The Court's ruling sustaining Plaintiff's objection should properly apply to Defendant Mark Fuller.
FIRST REQUESTED REVISION
That Plaintiff specify the actions of Defendant toward Plaintiff which are alleged to be substantially certain to result illness or economic loss.
REASON
The instant allegation is unduly vague. See P.B. Sec.
OBJECTION On December 4, 1995, the Court sustained Plaintiff's objection to Defendant Golf Club's Request to Revise the same allegation as is set forth in this paragraph against Defendant, Mark Fuller. The Court's ruling sustaining Plaintiff's objection should properly apply to Defendant, Mark Fuller.
FIRST REQUESTED REVISION
That Plaintiff specify the conduct of the Defendant, its agents, servants and/or employees, and Defendant Mark Fuller which allegedly resulted in Plaintiff's sustaining a chronic and permanent gastric intestinal disorder with internal bleeding and severe pain, and identify the agents, servants and/or employees of Defendant allegedly responsible.
REASON
The instant paragraph is unduly vague. See P.B. Sec.
OBJECTION On December 4, 1995, the Court sustained Plaintiff's objection to Defendant Golf Club's Request to revise the same allegation as is set forth in this paragraph against Defendant, Mark Fuller. The Court's ruling sustaining Plaintiff's objection should properly apply to Defendant Mark Fuller.
FIRST REQUESTED REVISION
That Plaintiff specify when and why Plaintiff was allegedly hospitalized on an emergency basis and specify the sum of money, the medical care, x-rays and medication which Plaintiff allegedly be required to expend and utilize.
REASON
The instant paragraph is unduly vague. See P.B. Section
OBJECTION On December 4, 1995, the Court sustained Plaintiff's objection to Defendant Golf Club's Request to Revise the same allegation as is set forth in this paragraph against Defendant, Mark Fuller. The Court's ruling sustaining Plaintiff's objection should properly apply to Defendant Mark Fuller.
FIRST REQUESTED REVISION
That Plaintiff specify what constituted the alleged "emotional distress" which is alleged to have resulted in headaches, loss of sleep, anxiety, depression, and loss of self esteem, and specify facts demonstrative of the injuries alleged.
REASON
The instant paragraph is unduly vague. Paragraph 25 does not specify what constituted the alleged "emotional distress, nor does it specify the facts demonstrative of the headaches, depression, loss of sleep, anxiety, and loss of self-esteem which is alleged to have been caused thereby, and Defendants cannot plead to this allegation unless Plaintiff does so.
OBJECTION On December 4, 1995, the Court sustained Plaintiff's objection to Defendant Golf Club's Request to Revise the same allegation as is set forth in this paragraph against Defendant, Mark Fuller. The Court's ruling sustaining Plaintiff's objection should properly apply to Defendant Mark Fuller.
FIRST REQUESTED REVISION
That Plaintiff specify the facts which demonstrate the alleged inability, specify with more particularity "suitable employment."
REASON
The instant allegation is unduly vague. See P.B. §
OBJECTION On December 4, 1995, the Court sustained Plaintiff's objection to Defendant Golf Club's Request to Revise the same allegation as is set forth in this paragraph against Defendant, Mark Fuller. The Court's ruling sustaining Plaintiff's objection should properly apply to Defendant Mark Fuller.
FIRST REQUESTED REVISION
Deleting this paragraph.
REASON
This paragraph constitutes an improper pleading of a legal conclusion.
OBJECTION On December 4, 1995, the Court sustained Plaintiff's objection to Defendant Golf Club's Request to Revise the same allegation as is set forth in this paragraph against Defendant, Mark Fuller. The Court's ruling sustaining Plaintiff's objection should properly apply to Defendant Mark Fuller.
FIRST REQUESTED REVISION
That Plaintiff specify the conduct and action of the Defendant, its agents, servants and/or employees which allegedly resulted in the injuries alleged, and identify the agents, servants and/or employees of Defendant who are alleged to have perpetrated the conduct and action which allegedly caused the CT Page 9882 alleged injuries.
REASON
The instant paragraph is unduly vague Paragraph 21 does not specify the conduct and actions of Defendant. its agents, servants and/or employees which allegedly resulted in the injuries alleged, nor does it identify the agents, servants and/or employees of Defendant who are alleged to have perpetrated the conduct and action which allegedly caused the alleged injuries, and Defendants cannot plead to this allegation until Plaintiff does so.
OBJECTION On December 4, 1995, the Court sustained Plaintiff's objection to Defendant Golf Club's Request to Revise the same allegation as is set forth in this paragraph against Defendant, Mark Fuller. The Court's ruling sustaining Plaintiff's objection should properly apply to Defendant Mark Fuller.
FIRST REQUESTED REVISION
That Plaintiff specify the date and reason he was allegedly hospitalized on an emergency basis, and specify the facts which demonstrate that he will allegedly be required to expend a sum of money for medical care, x-rays and medication, and specify the sum of money.
REASON
The instant paragraph is unduly vague. See P.B. Sec.
OBJECTION On December 4, 1995, the Court sustained Plaintiff's objection to Defendant Golf Club's Request to Revise the same allegation as is set forth in this paragraph against Defendant, Mark Fuller. The Court's ruling sustaining Plaintiff's objection should properly apply to Defendant Mark Fuller.
FIRST REQUESTED REVISION
That Plaintiff specify the emotional distress that is alleged to have resulted in the injuries alleged, and specifies the facts which demonstrate the injuries alleged.
REASON
The instant paragraph is unduly vague. See P.B. Sec.
OBJECTION On December 4, 1998 , the Court sustained Plaintiff's objection to Defendant Golf Club's Request to Revise the same allegation as is set forth in this paragraph against Defendant, Mark Fuller. The Court's ruling sustaining Plaintiff's objection should properly apply to Defendant Mark Fuller.
FIRST REQUESTED REVISION
That Plaintiff specify the facts which demonstrate that he is allegedly "effectively barred" from the golf industry, specify the facts which demonstrate his alleged economic loss resulting CT Page 9884 therefrom, and specify the facts that demonstrate Plaintiff's alleged inability to find suitable employment, and specify the facts that demonstrate "suitable employment."
REASON
This allegation is unduly vague. See P.B. Sec.
OBJECTION On December 4, 1995, the Court sustained Plaintiff's objection to Defendant Golf Club's Request to Revise the same allegation as is set forth in this paragraph against Defendant, Mark Fuller. The Court's ruling sustaining Plaintiff's objection should properly apply to Defendant Mark Fuller.
CFOURTH COUNT
FIRST REQUESTED REVISION
That Plaintiff identify the employees of Defendant who are alleged to have engaged in the alleged discriminatory conduct.
REASON
This paragraph is unduly vague. Plaintiff does not identify the employees of Defendant who engaged in the alleged discriminatory conduct. CT Page 9885
OBJECTION This paragraph is an allegation that Plaintiff's termination was due to issues of retaliation and is an allegation of fact and a proper pleading.
FIRST REQUESTED REVISION
That Plaintiff specify the words, actions and conduct which was used when he allegedly "reported" to Defendant's management, identify to whom he reported, and specify the discriminatory practice alleged.
REASON
The instant paragraph is unduly vague. See P.B. Sec.
OBJECTION This paragraph is an allegation that Plaintiff's termination was due to issues of retaliation and is an allegation of fact and a proper pleading.
FIRST REQUESTED REVISION
That Plaintiff specify the words, actions and conduct which was used when he allegedly reported to Defendant's management, CT Page 9886 identify to whom he reported and specify the discriminatory practice alleged.
REASON
The instant paragraph is unduly vague. See P B. Sec.
OBJECTION This paragraph is an allegation that Plaintiff's termination was due to issues of retaliation and is an allegation of fact and a proper pleading.
FIRST REQUESTED REVISION
That Plaintiff specify the words, actions and conduct that constituted the criticism of Plaintiff.
REASON
The instant paragraph is unduly vague. See P.B. Sec.
OBJECTION This paragraph is an allegation that Plaintiff's termination was due to issues of retaliation and is an allegation of fact and a proper pleading.
FIRST REQUESTED REVISION
That Plaintiff specify what number of days constituted failure to pay in a timely manner, and what detailed written proof was required.
REASON
The instant paragraph is unduly vague. See P.B. Sec.
OBJECTION This paragraph is an allegation that Plaintiff's termination was due to issues of retaliation and is an allegation of fact and a proper pleading.
FIRST REQUESTED REVISION
Deleting this paragraph.
REASON
This paragraph constitutes an improper pleading of a legal conclusion.
OBJECTION On December 4, 1995, the Court sustained Plaintiff's objection to Defendant Golf Club's Request to Revise the same allegation as is set forth in this paragraph against Defendant, Mark Fuller. The Court's ruling sustaining Plaintiff's objection should properly apply to Defendant Mark Fuller.
CT Page 9888
FIRST REQUESTED REVISION
Deleting this paragraph.
REASON
This paragraph constitutes an improper pleading of a legal conclusion.
OBJECTION On December 4, 1995, the Court sustained Plaintiff's objection Defendant Golf Club's Request to Revise the same allegation as is set forth in this paragraph against Defendant, Mark Fuller. The Court's ruling sustaining Plaintiff's objection should properly apply to Defendant Mark Fuller.
FIRST REQUESTED REVISION
That Plaintiff specify the conduct and action which is alleged to have resulted in the injuries alleged, and identify the agents, servants and/or employees who are alleged to have perpetrated the conduct and action.
REASON
The instant paragraph is unduly vague. See P.B. Sec.
OBJECTION On December 4, 1995, the Court sustained Plaintiff's CT Page 9889objection to Defendant Golf Club's Request to Revise the same allegation as is set forth in this paragraph against Defendant, Mark Fuller. The Court's ruling sustaining Plaintiff's objection should properly apply to Defendant Mark Fuller.
FIRST REQUESTED REVISION
That Plaintiff specify the actions, words or conduct which resulted in the alleged hospitalization, specify when and why Plaintiff was hospitalized, and specify the facts which establish the sum of money, medical care, x-rays and medication allegedly required, and specify the sum of money.
REASON
This paragraph is unduly vague. See P.B. Sec.
OBJECTION On December 4, 1995, the Court sustained Plaintiff's objection to Defendant Golf Club's Request to Revise the same allegation as is set forth in this paragraph against Defendant, Mark Fuller. The Court's ruling sustaining Plaintiff's objection should properly apply to Defendant Mark Fuller.
FIRST REQUESTED REVISION
That Plaintiff specify the "emotional distress" he is alleged CT Page 9890 to have suffered, and specify the facts which establish the alleged headaches, loss of sleep, anxiety, depression, and loss of self-esteem.
REASON
This paragraph is unduly vague. See P.B. Sec.
OBJECTION On December 4, 1995, the Court sustained Plaintiff's objection to Defendant Golf Club's Request to Revise the same allegation as is set forth in this paragraph against Defendant, Mark Fuller. The Court's ruling sustaining Plaintiff's objection should properly apply to Defendant Mark Fuller.
FIRST REQUESTED REVISION
That the Plaintiff specify his alleged inability to find employment in his field by the words, actions and deeds which demonstrate this alleged inability, specify with more particularity "suitable employment", and specify the facts which demonstrate his alleged "substantial economic loss."
REASON
The instant allegation is unduly vague. See Conn. P.B. Sec.
OBJECTION On December 4, 1995, the Court sustained Plaintiff's CT Page 9891objection to Defendant Golf Club's Request to Revise the same allegation as is set forth in this paragraph against Defendant, Mark Fuller. The Court's ruling sustaining Plaintiff's objection should properly apply to Defendant Mark Fuller.
FIRST REQUESTED REVISION
That Plaintiff specify the actions which are alleged to have been unreasonable and intentional, and to specify the facts which establish the alleged "illness" and "economic loss."
REASON
This paragraph is unduly vague. See P.B. Sec.
OBJECTION On December 4, 1995, the Court sustained Plaintiff's objection to Defendant Golf Club's Request to Revise the same allegation as is set forth in this paragraph against Defendant, Mark Fuller. The Court's ruling sustaining Plaintiff's objection should properly apply to Defendant Mark Fuller.
FIRST REQUESTED REVISION
Deleting this paragraph.
REASON CT Page 9892
This paragraph constitutes an improper pleading of a legal conclusion.
OBJECTION
On December 4, 1995, the Court sustained Plaintiff's objection to Defendant Golf Club's Request to Revise the same allegation as is set forth in this paragraph against Defendant, Mark Fuller. The Court's ruling sustaining Plaintiff's objection should properly apply to Defendant Mark Fuller.
FIRST REQUESTED REVISION
That Plaintiff specify what facts established that the equipment was "improperly" intrusted and establish "unqualified" and "unfair criticism," and identify the personnel alleged to have been improperly entrusted and who is alleged to have perpetrated the "unfair criticism."
REASON
This paragraph is unduly vague. See P.B. Sec.
OBJECTION On December 4, 1995, the Court sustained Plaintiff's objection to Defendant Golf Club's Request to Revise the same allegation as is set forth in this paragraph against Defendant, Mark Fuller. The Court's ruling sustaining CT Page 9893 Plaintiff's objection should properly apply to Defendant Mark Fuller.
FIRST REQUESTED REVISION
That Plaintiff specify the facts which establish that the thefts were "not properly reported."
REASON
This paragraph is unduly vague. See P.B. Section
OBJECTION
FIRST REQUESTED REVISION
That Defendant specify the potential blame and liability to which he was allegedly exposed and the time period in which these actions occurred.
REASON
This paragraph is unduly vague. See P.B. Sec.
OBJECTION
FIRST REQUESTED REVISION
That Plaintiff identify the employees referred to, and specify the discriminatory practices alleged.
REASON
This paragraph is unduly vague. See P.B. Sec.
OBJECTION On December 4, 1995, the Court sustained Plaintiff's objection to Defendant Golf Club's Request to Revise the same allegation as is set forth in this paragraph against Defendant, Mark Fuller. The Court's ruling sustaining Plaintiff's objection should properly apply to Defendant Mark Fuller.
FIRST REQUESTED REVISION
That Plaintiff specify the words and acts which establish that he was allegedly discouraged and coerced, criticized and harassed.
REASON CT Page 9895
This paragraph is unduly vague. See P.B. Sec.
OBJECTION This paragraph is an allegation that Plaintiff's termination was due to issues of retaliation and is an allegation of fact and a proper pleading.
FIRST REQUESTED REVISION
Specify the discriminatory practices alleged.
REASON
This paragraph is unduly vague. See P.B. Sec.
OBJECTION This paragraph is an allegation that Plaintiff's termination was due to an issue of retaliation and is an allegation of fact and a proper pleading.
FIRST REQUESTED REVISION
Specify the discriminatory practice alleged.
REASON
This paragraph is unduly vague. It does not specify the discriminatory practice alleged, without which Defendants cannot plead to this allegation. CT Page 9896
OBJECTION This paragraph is an allegation that Plaintiff's termination was due to an issue of retaliation and is an allegation of fact and a proper pleading.
FIRST REQUESTED REVISION
That Plaintiff identify the employees involved, describe the practical jokes and pranks, and the dates thereof and the facts establishing that same were directed at Plaintiff and disrupted Plaintiff's performance of his duties.
REASON
This paragraph is unduly vague. See P.B. Sec.
OBJECTION Allegations of actions disrupting the performance of Plaintiff's duties are set forth throughout the Third Party Complaint and to repeat them would be redundant. The allegations are evidentiary in nature and are the proper subject of Defendants' discovery.
FIRST REQUESTED REVISION
That Plaintiff specify what acts constituted "other improper conduct." CT Page 9897
REASON
This paragraph is unduly vague. See P.B. Sec.
OBJECTION Allegations of acts of all improper conduct are set forth throughout the Third Party Complaint and to repeat them would be redundant. The allegations are evidentiary in nature and are the proper subject of defendants' discovery.
FIRST REQUESTED REVISION
Delete this paragraph.
REASON
This paragraph contains an improper pleading of a legal conclusion.
OBJECTION Allegations of fraudulent intentions are evidentiary and the proper subject of Defendants' discovery.
FIRST REQUESTED REVISION
That Plaintiff specify the facts which establish the alleged "lack of proper management supervision and control," what constituted an "insecure, unstable and hostile atmosphere," which CT Page 9898 other employees acted disruptively and improperly, and what constituted "disruptive and improper" actions.
REASON
This allegation is unduly vague. See P.B. Sec.
OBJECTION On December 4, 1995, the Court sustained Plaintiff's objection to Defendant Golf Club's Request to Revise the same allegation as is set forth in this paragraph against Defendant, Mark Fuller. The Court's ruling sustaining Plaintiff's objection should properly apply to Defendant Mark Fuller.
FIRST REQUESTED REVISION
That Plaintiff specify the facts which establish the alleged "lack of proper management and control."
REASON
This allegation is unduly vague. See P.B. Sec.
OBJECTION On December 4, 1995, the Court sustained Plaintiff's objection to Defendant Golf Club's Request to Revise the same allegation as is set forth in this paragraph against Defendant, Mark Fuller. The Court's ruling sustaining Plaintiff's objection should properly apply to Defendant Mark Fuller.
CT Page 9899
FIRST REQUESTED REVISION
That Plaintiff specify the facts which establish the emotional distress, headaches, loss of sleep, anxiety, depression and loss of self esteem alleged. REASON
This paragraph is unduly vague. See P.B. Sec.
OBJECTION On December 4, 1995, the Court sustained Plaintiff's objection to Defendant Golf Club's Request to Revise the same allegation as is set forth in this paragraph against Defendant, Mark Fuller. The Court's ruling sustaining Plaintiff's objection should properly apply to Defendant Mark Fuller.
FIRST REQUESTED REVISION
That Plaintiff specify the sum of money, medical care, x-rays and medication he has required and will require, and when and why he was hospitalized on an emergency basis.
REASON
This paragraph is unduly vague. See P.B. Section
OBJECTION On December 4, 1995, the Court sustained Plaintiff's CT Page 9900objection to Defendant Golf Club's Request to Revise the same allegation as is set forth in this paragraph against Defendant, Mark Fuller. The Court's ruling sustaining Plaintiff's objection should properly apply to Defendant Mark Fuller.
FIRST REQUESTED REVISION
That the Plaintiff specify his alleged inability to find employment in his field by the words, actions and deeds which demonstrate this alleged inability, specify with more particularity "suitable employment", and specify the facts which demonstrate his alleged "substantial economic loss."
REASON
The instant allegation is unduly vague. See Conn. P.B. Sec.
OBJECTION On December 4, 1995, the Court sustained Plaintiff's objection to Defendant Golf Club's Request to Revise the same allegation as is set forth in this paragraph against Defendant, Mark Fuller. The Court's ruling sustaining Plaintiff's objection should properly apply to Defendant Mark Fuller.
FIRST REQUESTED REVISION
That Plaintiff specify the injuries and consequential losses allegedly sustained, and specify the facts which establish the "improper" conduct of Mark Fuller, and identify the other employees and Board members referred to and specify the facts which establish that Plaintiff's firing was "false and improper."
REASON
This paragraph is unduly vague. See P.B. Sec.
OBJECTION On December 4, 1995, the Court sustained Plaintiff's objection to Defendant Golf Club's Request to Revise the same allegation as is set forth in this paragraph against Defendant, Mark Fuller. The Court's ruling sustaining Plaintiff's objection should properly apply to Defendant Mark Fuller.
Done at Bridgeport, Connecticut, this 2nd day of July, 1998
STACEY M. DAVES-OHLIN DURANT, NICHOLS, HOUSTON, MITCHELL SHEAHAN, P.C. 1057 Broad Street Bridgeport, CT 06604 (203)366-3438 Juris No. 105065
ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANTS THE CONNECTICUT GOLF CLUB, INC. and MARK FULLER