DocketNumber: File No. 100543
Citation Numbers: 131 A.2d 336, 20 Conn. Super. Ct. 240, 20 Conn. Supp. 240
Judges: SHANNON, J.
Filed Date: 3/14/1957
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 1/12/2023
This is an action for damages on an insurance policy issued to the late John A. Maxwell insuring him against accidental death, which it is alleged occurred on February 22, 1956.
Section 2793d of the 1955 Cumulative Supplement to the General Statutes provides that "(a) Any of the following acts in this state, effected by mail or otherwise, by an unauthorized foreign or alien insurer: (1) The issuance or delivery of contracts of insurance to residents of this state . . .; (2) the solicitation of applications for such contracts; (3) the collection of premiums, membership fees, assessments or other considerations for such contracts; or (4) any other transaction of the business of insurance, *Page 241 is equivalent to and shall constitute an appointment by such insurer of the insurance commissioner and his successor or successors in office, to be its true and lawful attorney, upon whom may be served all lawful process in any action, suit or proceeding instituted by or on behalf of an insured or beneficiary arising out of any such contracts of insurance, and any such act shall be signification of its agreement that such service of process is of the same legal force and validity as personal service of process in this state upon such insurer."
The complaint alleges that the defendant has transacted the business of insurance in this state in that it delivered contracts of insurance to residents of this state, solicited applications for such contracts, collected membership fees, assessments and other considerations for such contracts and has come into the state to investigate the claim of the plaintiffs as well as other claims. The defendant has pleaded in abatement, alleging that it has done none of these things except by mail from out of the state and has not come into the state to investigate any claims except by wholly independent, uncontrolled investigating agencies. The plaintiffs have demurred to this plea in abatement.
There have been holdings that this ran counter to due process and was an improper effort to regulate the use of the United States mail. However, Judge Medina in Schutt v. Commercial TravelersMutual Accident Assn.,
The demurrer is sustained.