DocketNumber: No. CV92 04 01 44S
Citation Numbers: 1993 Conn. Super. Ct. 9670
Judges: RUSH, J.
Filed Date: 11/10/1993
Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 4/18/2021
The issues involve a loan made by the plaintiff to the defendant's husband against whom judgment has already been entered. The finding by the ATR establishes that the defendant promised that "we" would repay the plaintiff when they were able. However, the finding is insufficient to determine whether the promise made by the defendant was made after her husband borrowed the money and failed to repay the loan and, therefore, within the statute or, whether, it was an original undertaking made prior to the time the funds were transferred to the husband (as indicated by the partial transcript filed on behalf of the plaintiff).
Accordingly, the court hereby refers the matter to the Attorney Trial Referee who heard the evidence for an articulation of the factual foundation necessary to decide the issues raised by the parties.
RUSH, J.