DocketNumber: No. CV 98-0580758
Citation Numbers: 1998 Conn. Super. Ct. 15496
Judges: CORRIGAN, JUDGE TRIAL REFEREE.
Filed Date: 12/28/1998
Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 7/5/2016
The petitioner testified that the PSI contained information alluding to some sexual contact for which he was not prosecuted and should have been erased pursuant to G.S. 54-142a. The petitioner has introduced pages from the respondent's regulations which he claims prevent their use. See Petitioner's Exhibits 1and 2.
Frederick Levesque, director of offender Classification and Population Management for the Department of Correction, testified that the named respondent is a counselor at MacDougall who works within the department which he directs. Assessments are made for each inmate for classification as to risk and as to treatment so that they may be properly placed in a facility which can provide adequate distraction in the case of risk and adequate staff in the case of treatment. To make such classification he has used all proper documents including police incident reports, PSI, mittimus, health and hospital reports, and interviews. In the case of the petitioner his PSI was used for the crimes for which he was convicted. Assault of a victim sixty years or older in the first degree and burglary in the first degree. See Respondent'sExhibit A. The underlying conduct for these charges were of a sexual nature.
Although the petitioner was originally charged with a third crime of sexual assault in the first degree that charge was not dismissed, nolled nor was a finding of not guilty made. The plea bargain resulted in his plea to the other two charges which encompassed the conduct recited in the PSI. Therefore the statute, G.S. 54-142a, does not provide for erasure of the records claimed by the petitioner nor the regulations enacted by the Commissioner, Petitioner's Exhibits 1 and 2, prevent their use for his classification.
For the above reasons the petitioner is denied.
Thomas H. Corrigan Judge Trial Referee CT Page 15498