DocketNumber: No. CV 92 0127723
Citation Numbers: 1993 Conn. Super. Ct. 6786, 8 Conn. Super. Ct. 867
Judges: LEWIS, JUDGE.
Filed Date: 7/19/1993
Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 7/5/2016
The matter was placed, on the administrative appeals calendar, Practice Book 254(3), and at a calendar call on March 17, 1993, scheduling orders were issued relative to the filing of the record on appeal, as well as briefs by the parties. The defendant has filed a motion (#111) to vacate these orders on the ground that this action by the plaintiff is not an "administrative appeal."
Administrative appeals are defined by Practice Book 255 as those taken "pursuant to statute," or "other enabling legislation." The statute authorizing the establishment of a municipal board of ethics is General Statutes
It therefore appears that the defendant Board is correct that this action is not an administrative appeal as defined by Practice Book 255. It follows that the case should not have appeared on the administrative CT Page 6787 appeals calendar, and according the scheduling orders issued at that call are vacated. The case is returned to plea and motion status.
So Ordered.
Dated at Stamford, Connecticut, this 19th day of July, 1993.
William B. Lewis, Judge