DocketNumber: No. CV 97 571228 S
Citation Numbers: 1999 Conn. Super. Ct. 13955
Judges: BERGER, JUDGE. CT Page 13956
Filed Date: 10/20/1999
Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 7/5/2016
The matter was originally scheduled for trial on August 19, 1999 but, due to discovery issues, was continued to a future date. One of the discovery issues concerned the disclosure of the names of additional officers involved in the arrest. On August 17, 1999, plaintiff moved to cite in one of these individuals as a party defendant. The plaintiff seeks to name one Sergeant McClure as a party alleging that he was unable to identify her until a recent disclosure. The defendant opposes this motion arguing that the statute of limitations has now passed and that the plaintiffs proposed pleading is insufficient as a matter of law.
Moreover, it is clear that "[a]mendments relate back to the date of the complaint unless they allege a new cause of action."Keenan v. Yale New Haven Hospital,
Accordingly, the objection must be sustained because the alleged incident occurred April 19, 1995 and the three year statute of limitations set forth in General Statutes §
The defendant's second objection is also a sufficient ground to deny the plaintiffs motion. As stated by the plaintiff, he CT Page 13957 only wishes to add Sergeant McClure as a party; he does not seek to change or add any allegations to the complaint. While "supervising officers may be held liable in certain circumstances for constitutional injuries inflicted by their subordinates",Shaw v. Stroud,
Having plead no additional allegations against Sergeant McClure, Officer Gallo's supervisor, the request must fail.
For the above reasons the Motion to Cite in Sergeant McClure is denied.
Berger, J.