DocketNumber: No. X06-CV 94 0156090S
Citation Numbers: 2003 Conn. Super. Ct. 1778
Judges: McWEENY, JUDGE.
Filed Date: 2/5/2003
Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 7/5/2016
The plaintiffs' essential claims appear to be related to trade secret misappropriation. The resolution of such issue would likely resolve the case.
Proceeding with the trade secret claims by courtside trial also would provide the plaintiffs with a forum for their sanctions claims. The court and a jury could hear all of the plaintiffs' complaint simultaneously, but not the sanctions claims.
If we proceed with a jury trial in March, we would not have the opportunity for a sanctions hearing, unless the trial were delayed.
Proceeding with evidence on both the sanctions and trade secret claims before the court in March offers an opportunity to resolve the essential issues on the merits at the earliest date.
The parties are invited to comment on this proposal in writing by February 10, 2003, and may submit their papers by facsimile directly to the court.
ROBERT F. McWEENY, J. CT Page 1779