DocketNumber: No. FA83 0212429 S
Citation Numbers: 1992 Conn. Super. Ct. 981
Judges: KARAZIN, JR., JUDGE CT Page 982
Filed Date: 1/30/1992
Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 7/5/2016
Judge Harrigan already ruled on a motion for contempt. that he was not in violation by so doing. It appears that the appropriate procedure in this matter would have been for the wife to have modified the order if she found out that this was his course of conduct and then attempt to hold him in contempt. This judgment was rendered in 1984, and she had more than reasonable amount of time to do this.
The court finds that she has not established by a fair preponderance of the evidence that the husband has wilfully, without excuse violated a valid court order. Accordingly, the motion for contempt is denied.
EDWARD R. KARAZIN, JR., JUDGE