DocketNumber: No. CV 96-0471735S
Citation Numbers: 1996 Conn. Super. Ct. 4112-AAA
Judges: FINEBERG, JUDGE.
Filed Date: 5/16/1996
Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 4/17/2021
The Plaintiffs object to the motion on the grounds that an apportionment party must be a party who can be named and served, and thus cannot be a "John Doe" party. The Court concurs.
Apportionment is subject to General Statutes §
(c) In a negligence action to recover damages resulting from personal injury, wrongful death or damage to property occurring on or after October 1, 1987, if the damages are determined to be proximately caused by the negligence of more than one party, each party against whom recovery is allowed shall be liable to the claimant only for his proportionate share of the recoverable . . . damages . . . .
Apportionment is therein limited to a "party".
Apportionment does not lie against an unidentified person. Accord: Delaurentis v. Gervais, Superior Court, judicial district of Waterbury, Docket No. CV 95-124011 (October 12, 1995, Fasano, J.).
The Plaintiffs' Objection to Defendant's Motion to Cite In is sustained.
DAVID L. FINEBERG JUDGE, SUPERIOR COURT