DocketNumber: No. CV-98-0567164
Judges: LAVINE, JUDGE.
Filed Date: 2/11/1998
Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 4/18/2021
The facts are set out in the parties' submissions and will not be reviewed here.
Haynes relies upon Conn. General Statutes Section
Where the parties mutually agreed to submit a dispute to arbitration, as in this case, see Exhibit A attached to Application to Correct Arbitration Award, judicial review is limited. Hartford v. Board of Mediation Arbitration,
I agree with Emidio's argument that in this case it is the means or method by which the arbitrator arrived at his award, not the alleged evident material miscalculation of figures, which forms the basis for Haynes application. To grant the application would. in the Court's view, be to affect the merits of the controversy.
I conclude that, on the present record, Haynes has failed to demonstrate that there has been an evident material miscalculation of figures. The application is therefore denied.
Douglas S. Lavine Judge, Superior Court