DocketNumber: No. 116503
Citation Numbers: 1999 Conn. Super. Ct. 7026
Judges: HURLEY, JUDGE TRIAL REFEREE.
Filed Date: 6/14/1999
Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 4/17/2021
Since the complaint fails to set forth a negligence claim against East, an apportionment of negligence between East and Black Hall is impermissible according to Black Hall.
However, the court finds that although the case against East is labeled a breach of contract action by the "headings" of the count, the actual allegations are those of negligence. In such a case, the court finds that since negligence was actually alleged, the defendant may move under the statutes for an apportionment of the negligence.
The court finds the case of [Conco Medical Comoanv v. Zimmerand Zimmer, Superior Court, Bridgeport, Docket No. 332956 (February 6, 1997, Thim, J.)
"While the defendants' duty to follow the standard of care is based on a contractual relationship, the gravamen of the claim is negligence. The mere characterization of the first CT Page 7028 count as a contract claim is, not a basis for striking defendants' apportionment complaint." [Conco, at 1 884.
Accordingly, the motion to strike the first count of the apportionment complaint is granted.
D. Micheal Hurley, Judge Trial Referee