DocketNumber: No. CV94 0535590
Citation Numbers: 1996 Conn. Super. Ct. 9237
Judges: CORRADINO, J.
Filed Date: 11/25/1996
Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 4/17/2021
As to paragraph 3 the reference to CWC was incorrect and SCASCO was the intended reference.
As to paragraph 2, I think a request to revise would be or could have been appropriate because at this juncture paragraphs 13a, b and d really do not set forth different causes of action. In that sense the situation is not like that in Oink Inc. v. AnnSt. Limited,
CORRADINO, J. CT Page 9238