DocketNumber: No. UWY CV 98 014 89 05
Citation Numbers: 2000 Conn. Super. Ct. 10263
Judges: HODGSON, JUDGE OF THE SUPERIOR COURT.
Filed Date: 8/16/2000
Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 4/18/2021
Comparison of the complaint that was the subject of the hospital's request to revise and the proposed amended complaint reveals that the plaintiffs have repeated verbatim and not have revised in the manner requested the allegations set forth at Count 1, paragraphs 2 and 6 and other counts against this defendant which incorporate the same allegations. Additionally, the plaintiffs have also not revised the allegation that was the subject of the hospital's seventh request to revise, in that they continue to allege at Count 5 paragraph 10 precisely the same allegation, as in their original complaint, with no revision.
The proposed amended complaint does, however, comply with the third, fourth, fifth and eighth requests to revise.
Pursuant to Practice Book §
The hospital asserts that leave to amend should also be denied because of the pendency of co-defendant Ying-Sek Chan's motion to strike two counts directed only to him. The court has adjudicated this point in its ruling on an objection filed by Dr. Chan. For the reasons set forth in that memorandum of decision, the court has found that this ground does not furnish a further reason for denying leave to amend.
Conclusion
The plaintiffs' request to file the proposed amended complaint against defendant St. Mary's Hospital is denied for the reasons set forth above.
Beverly J. Hodgson Date Judge of the Superior Court