DocketNumber: No. CV93 052 17 83 S
Citation Numbers: 1993 Conn. Super. Ct. 7054
Judges: WALSH, JUDGE.
Filed Date: 8/10/1993
Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 4/17/2021
The Plaintiffs have raised the issue of fraudulent concedment of the action by the Defendant, in their Fourth Reply To The Defendant's First Special Defense, filed June 24, 1993, and on Pages 7 and 8 of their Memorandum dated June 28, 1993.
"If any person liable to an action by another, fraudulently conceals from him the existence of the cause of such action, such cause of action shall be deemed to accrue against such person so liable therefor at the time when the person entitled to sue thereon first discovers its existence. Conn. Gen. Stat.
52-595 .
Although the mere presence of an adverse claim is not sufficient to defeat a motion for summary judgment, the Court holds that the "Plaintiff's Fourth Reply To The Defendant's First Special Defense," is factually specific enough to create a genuine issue of material fact when read together with the affidavits of Leonard J. Baginski and Kathleen K. McGarry.
Motion For Summary Judgment is denied.
Richard A. Walsh, J.