DocketNumber: No. CV94317618S
Citation Numbers: 1995 Conn. Super. Ct. 1693, 13 Conn. L. Rptr. 523
Judges: THIM, J.
Filed Date: 2/21/1995
Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 4/18/2021
"Pleading and proof of aggrievement [are] prerequisites to the trial court's jurisdiction over the subject matter of the plaintiffs' appeal." Petruzzi v. Zoning Board of Appeals,
The defendants cite various court opinions for the proposition that a plaintiff must allege facts which, if true, would demonstrate aggrievement. Each of the opinions, however, concerns a factual situation where the plaintiff was afforded the opportunity to prove aggrievement. In the present case, the plaintiffs have alleged they are aggrieved. Had the defendants desired to test the ability of the plaintiffs to allege specific facts which would support a general claim of aggrievement, the defendants could have requested the plaintiffs to make their allegations of aggrievement more specific. See Practice Book § 147. In the absence of a more complete statement, the court can only conclude that the plaintiffs have alleged aggrievement. Having alleged aggrievement, they should be given the opportunity to prove their allegations.
The defendants have not moved under General Statutes §
The motion to dismiss is denied.