DocketNumber: No. CV01-0076346
Judges: SULLIVAN, JUDGE.
Filed Date: 8/17/2001
Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 4/18/2021
The court found that the allegations and findings of the Committee demonstrated a substantial threat of irreparable harm to the respondent's existing and prospective clients. The court also found that because Attorney Lederer was not communicating with her clients, and had not communicated with nor obeyed the subpoenas of the Committee, the continuing and potential harm to her current and prospective clients warranted an immediate interim suspension and appointment of a trustee to protect the interests of the client.
Accordingly, on July 17, 2001, the court ordered that the respondent be temporarily suspended from the practice of law, pending a hearing on the motion for an interim suspension, and that Attorney Mary Bergamini be appointed as trustee pursuant to Section 2-64 to inventory files, secure clients' fund accounts and take whatever other action necessary to protect the interests of the clients of Attorney Lederer. The court also ordered that notice be given to Attorney Lederer of a hearing on the motions to be held on August 16, 2001.
A hearing was held on August 16, 2001 concerning the above motions. Fifteen exhibits were introduced by the petitioner Committee documenting and supporting the allegations of the motion for interim suspension and appointment of a trustee. Attorney Lederer appeared at the hearing and filed a pro se appearance. She acknowledged to the court that she has been experiencing significant personal physical and emotional problems over the past year. She offered no explanation as to why she did not respond to the subpoenas issued by the Committee. In addition, Attorney Bergamini appeared and informed the court that she has been unable to begin her duties as trustee to inventory Attorney Lederer's files, or secure her client fund accounts, because she has been unable to contact or communicate with Attorney Lederer since being appointed trustee. CT Page 12240
After a careful review of the evidence, and taking into consideration the comments of the respondent concerning her personal difficulties, the court finds that the professional conduct compounded by the personal problems of the respondent constitute a substantial and immediate threat of irreparable harm to her existing and prospective clients. Accordingly, pursuant to Practice Book Section
Terence A. Sullivan Superior Court Judge