DocketNumber: No. CV90-0274481S
Citation Numbers: 1994 Conn. Super. Ct. 2836
Judges: VERTEFEUILLE, JUDGE.
Filed Date: 3/15/1994
Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 4/18/2021
Plaintiff's counsel agreed to "FAX" the court a copy of his objections later in the day on February 15 and he did so. He also mailed the court a copy of the same objections.
The plaintiff's objections are dated January 27, 1994. The copies provided to the court by plaintiff's counsel do not show any stamp indicating the date of filing with the clerk. The court file still does not contain either a copy or an original version of the plaintiff's objections. The date shown on plaintiff's objections, January 27, 1994, is more than two weeks after the filing of the ATR's decision on plaintiff's motion to correct.
The court finds that no objections to the ATR's report were ever filed with the court and accordingly, judgment is entered for the defendants as recommended in the ATR report. If the plaintiff did file objections to the ATR's report, the objections could not have been filed on or before January 24, 1994, the required filing date, which is two weeks after the filing of the ATR's decision on the motion to correct. Practice Book 441. The copy of the objections provided by plaintiff's counsel bears the date of January 27, 1994, three days after the date when objections were required to be filed.
CHRISTINE S. VERTEFEUILLE, JUDGE