DocketNumber: No. 0123279
Citation Numbers: 1996 Conn. Super. Ct. 9637
Judges: SHORTALL, J.
Filed Date: 11/21/1996
Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 4/17/2021
Based on the documentation supplied by the plaintiff at the hearing on September 23, it seems that he finally bestirred himself to seek ways of refinancing the mortgages or otherwise saving the defendant harmless. Although his efforts have a distinct "going through the motions" flavor, the court cannot find with the requisite degree of certainty that he has wilfully failed to comply with the order of August 14, 1996. Therefore, the court declines to impose any fines upon the plaintiff.
The court is convinced from the evidence submitted on September 23, 1996 and at an earlier hearing on May 6, 1996 that the plaintiff decided as long ago as the fall of 1995 not to make substantial efforts to save the property formerly owned by the parties and on which the defendant is liable. This failure on the plaintiff's part has led directly to the judgment of foreclosure that was entered by the court on September 30, 1996. See file #CV96-131757. Therefore, he remains liable to the defendant for any and all financial consequences which she may bear as a result of his contempt of the court's orders.
SHORTALL, J. CT Page 9638