DocketNumber: No. CR 7-184309
Citation Numbers: 2002 Conn. Super. Ct. 2674, 31 Conn. L. Rptr. 551
Judges: FRACASSE, JUDGE.
Filed Date: 3/11/2002
Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 4/18/2021
On February 1, 2002, the defendant was found guilty of Assault in the First Degree in violation of §
Defendant's bond was revoked by the court upon conviction pursuant to General Statutes §
In pertinent part §
Said statutory provisions apply to the offense on which defendant has been found guilty.
Contrary to defendant's claims, the application of said statutory provisions to defendant's conviction is not retroactive application of said provisions. Defendant was convicted after the effective date of §
Also, contrary to defendant's claims, the application of said statutory provisions to defendant is not in violation of the separation of powers doctrine.
"A statute will be held unconstitutional on those grounds if: (1) it governs subject matter that not only falls within the judicial power, but also lies exclusively within judicial control; or (2) it significantly interferes with the order by functioning of the Superior Court's judicial role. State v. Campbell,
There is nothing to suggest that said statutory provisions interfere with the orderly functioning of the court; and authority over bail is not within exclusive judicial control. State v. Menillo, 159C, 264, 267;State v. Ayala, 222C 331, 342-46; State v. Gaylord Salters, 200, Conn. Super. Lexis 3034 (unreported); General Statutes Chapter 960.
Accordingly, defendant's motion is denied.
Fracasse, J.