DocketNumber: No. CV 01-0811567 S
Citation Numbers: 2001 Conn. Super. Ct. 15987
Judges: RITTENBAND, JUDGE TRIAL REFEREE.
Filed Date: 12/3/2001
Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 4/18/2021
1. The Petitioner was arrested on January 12, 2000 on Docket No. 155840 to which he pleaded guilty on December 1, 2000 and was sentenced to thirteen years imprisonment. He is seeking jail credit from January 12, 2000 up to December 1, 2001 as pre-sentence jail credit.
2. On January 28, 2000 he received a sentence of four months on Docket No. 194906. At that point he became a sentenced prisoner and was held on that sentence. That sentence would have expired on May 27, 2000. However, on May 18, 2000 he was sentenced to three years imprisonment for the sale of narcotics. Therefore, he remained a sentenced prisoner from January 28, 2000 until at least December 1, 2000.
3. As a sentenced prisoner he was no longer entitled to pre-sentence jail credit from January 28, 2000 and thereafter. He did receive sixteen days credit pursuant to Public Act 01-78 for the period January 12, 2000 to January 28, 2000.
The issue, then, is as follows:
Is the Petitioner entitled to pre-sentence jail credit on one chargewhile he is a sentenced prisoner on another charge?
The answer is No.
C.G.S. §
". . . provided (1) each day of pre-sentence confinement shall be counted only once for the purpose of reducing all sentences imposed after such pre-sentence confinement and (2) the provisions of this section shall only apply to a person for whom the existence of a mittimus, (which has been interpreted as a continuance mittimus which is pretrial) an inability to obtain bail or the denial of bail is the sole reason for his pre-sentence confinement . . ."
A reason for his confinement including and subsequent to January 28, 2000 is the sentences he received of four months and three years. Accordingly, a mittimus or an inability to obtain bail or the denial of bail is not the sole reason for his presentence confinement. In short, a prisoner cannot use credit for pre-sentence confinement and credit for a sentence. See Johnson v. Manson,
Further, if the Court were to accept Petitioner's reasoning, he would receive credit against his four month and three year sentences as well as pre-sentence credit for the sentence which was imposed on December 1, 2000. Therefore, he would be receiving credit twice which is specifically prohibited by C.G.S. §
Accordingly, the petition is DENIED.