DocketNumber: No. FA83 0212429 S (A.C. 11117)
Citation Numbers: 1992 Conn. Super. Ct. 4005
Judges: KARAZIN, J.
Filed Date: 4/29/1992
Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 4/17/2021
The court has reread its memorandum of decision and finds that it is abundantly clear as to what the court and the basis on which it ruled. This court has complied with the requirement of Powers v. Powers,
It is the duty of the judge who tried the case to set forth the basis for his decision.
An articulation is not appropriate where the trial court's decision contains no ambiguity or deficiency reasonably susceptible of clarification. A review of the memorandum of decision against the motion for articulation leads this court to conclude that its decision was clear, unambiguous and complete. In addition, information is sought beyond the scope of a motion for articulation.
Accordingly, the motion for articulation dated February 28, 1992, number 187 on the docket, is denied.
EDWARD R. KARAZIN, JR., JUDGE