DocketNumber: No. FA01 03827 50 CT Page 6890
Citation Numbers: 2001 Conn. Super. Ct. 6889
Judges: BRENNAN, JUDGE.
Filed Date: 5/23/2001
Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 4/18/2021
Said maternal grandmother asserts she has no obligation to submit the affidavit since, she claims, she has no support obligation.
The maternal grandmother may, ultimately, prove to be right on the lack of jurisdiction for the court to order her to pay fees. However, her presence in the case is clear and the court should have all the information it needs when considering the legal obligation, if any, on the part of the maternal grandmother.
To date, the maternal grandmother has:
a) signed a stipulation accepting primary residence of the child.
b) been named a respondent in a protective order involving the child;
c) for a pro se appearance "for relief only" (sic);
d) been the participant and beneficiary of visitation orders negotiated for her by Attorney Hesslin who identifies herself as "for the Resp. Betty Shovenac";
e) directed Attorney Hesslin to represent her in this file, at least for limited purposes.
Whether there is a creature known as a "limited appearance" and whether one who seeks and obtains judicial intervention on custody and visitation has liability for fees, are legal questions yet to be debated and decided.
The order concerning the submission of a financial affidavit is CT Page 6891 restated and compliance shall be completed by 6/01/01.
DANIEL E. BRENNAN, JR., J.