DocketNumber: No. CV 90 0107529
Citation Numbers: 1999 Conn. Super. Ct. 3398
Judges: LEWIS, JUDGE.
Filed Date: 3/24/1999
Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 4/17/2021
The plaintiff claims that it is entitled to attorneys fees of approximately $32,000 because of General Statutes §
The referee made a finding of fact that there was no contractual commitment on the part of the defendants to pay attorney's fees, either in the contract between the parties or in certain "job tickets" which referred to attorney's fees.1
Therefore, since the court previously accepted this factual finding, the only remaining basis for awarding legal fees is statutory. The plaintiff contends that since it filed a lien and sought its foreclosure, it is entitled to fees under General Statutes §
This court agrees with the defendant that the statute does not apply to the recovery of legal fees in connection with the underlying breach of contract action, since there is no contractual basis for such an award. However, in this courts memorandum of decision, the plaintiff was directed to claim this matter for the foreclosure short calendar to determine, for example, the type of foreclosure and the date thereof. In connection with the foreclosure aspect of the case, the plaintiff CT Page 3400 will necessarily incur legal fees. Those fees are reimbursable pursuant to General Statutes §
Thus, this court declines to award attorney's fees to the plaintiff in connection with the trial of the underlying controversy. Attorney's fees should be limited to the time expended in connection with the actual foreclosure proceedings themselves. See A. Secondino Son. Inc. v. LoRicco,
So Ordered.
Dated at Stamford, Connecticut, this 24th day of March, 1999.
William B. Lewis, Judge